Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;7(4):448–452. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12929

Table 1.

Clinical features of the XDP gait disorder cases

Demographics and Diagnosis Dystonia Features Parkinsonism Features
Case Sex, dx Age Assess, yr Age Onset, yr Phenotype TAF‐1 SVA Repeat Length Dystonia BFM Cerv OM Speech Larynx Bleph Trunk UE LE Gait Park UPDRS Hypomim Hypoph Bradyk Trem Gait Freezing Post inst
1 M, XDP 42 39 DP 42 Y 10 + + ++ Y 27 ++ + ++ ++
2 M, XDP 40 37 DP 43 Y 20.5 +++ +++ +++ ++ Y 38 + + +++ ++
3 M, XDP 53 47 DP 47 Y 43.5 + +++ + + ++ ++ +++ Y 46 ++ + ++ + +++ +++
4 M, XDP 54 51 DP 39 Y 15 +++ ++ +++ + + Y 39 + ++ ++ ++

Severity is designated by + denoting mild, ++ moderate, and +++ severe. Details regarding the TAF‐1 SVA hexameric expansion are also shown.

dx, diagnosis; Age assess, age at assessment; Age onset, age at onset of symptoms; M, male; F, female; y, years; XDP, X‐linked dystonia parkinsonism; DP, dystonia parkinsonism; SVA, sine‐VNTR‐Alu—short interspersed nuclear element, variable number of tandem repeats, and Alu composite; Y, yes; N, no; BFM: Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale score; Cerv, cervical dystonia; OM, oromandibular dystonia; Bleph, blepharospasm; UE, upper‐extremity dystonia; LE, lower‐extremity dystonia; Parkin, parkinsonism; UPDRS, MDS‐UPDRS Part 3 motor score; Hypomim, hypomimia; Hypoph, hypophonia; Bradyk, bradykinesia; Trem, presence of resting tremor; Post Inst, postural instability.