Table 6.

Clade names and associated binomials (if used) for three analyses of cryptic lineages within the ruber species group of Hipposideros. No genetic analysis of this group has included type material; consequently, the application of binomials hinges on the robustness of ancillary morphological analyses, which were not conducted in our study. Boldfaced names denote clades supported by all four prior schemes in our BPP delimitation analyses.

Vallo et al. (2008)		Monadjem et al. (2013)		This paper
A1	H. caffer			caffer 4
		A1a	H. caffer	caffer 4
		A1b	H. caffer	caffer 4
A2	H. caffer		H. caffer tephrus	caffer 1
B	H. ruber			caffer 5
		B1	H. ruber	cf. lamottei
		B2	H. ruber	caffer 7
C1	H. ruber			ruber 1, ruber 2
		C1a	H. cf. ruber	ruber 1
		C1b	H. cf. ruber	ruber 1
C2	H. ruber	C2	H. cf. ruber	ruber 3
				ruber 4
D	H. ruber		H. cf. ruber	cf. ruber
		D1	H. cf. ruber	cf. ruber
		D2	H. cf. ruber	cf. ruber
–		E1	H. cf. ruber	cf. ruber
–		E2	H. cf. ruber	cf. ruber
–		–		caffer 2
–		–		caffer 3
–		–		caffer 6
–		–		caffer 8
abae	H. abae	abae	H. abae	abae
beatus	H. beatus	beatus	H. beatus	beatus1, beatus 2
fuliginosus	H. fuliginosus	fuliginosus	H. fuliginosus	fuliginosus
lamottei	H. lamottei	lamottei	H. lamottei	lamottei