TABLE 4.

Estimated marginal mean contrasts for logDur1 for TMS condition (effective vs. sham), TMS site (aIFG and pIFG), and task (grammatical vs. lexical), using mvt adjustment.

Contrast	Δ logDur1	SE	df	t	p
Effective, gram, pIFG – sham, gram, pIFG	–0.12	0.01	4629	–9.4	< 0.001
Effective, gram, pIFG – effective, lex, pIFG	–0.32	0.01	4629	–24.3	< 0.001
Effective, gram, pIFG – effective, gram, aIFG	–0.09	0.01	4629	–6.8	< 0.001
Effective, lex, pIFG – sham, lex, pIFG	–0.03	0.01	4629	–2.4	0.14
Effective, lex, pIFG – effective, lex, aIFG	–0.04	0.01	4629	–2.8	0.049
Effective, gram, aIFG – sham, gram, aIFG	–0.02	0.01	4629	–1.7	0.53
Effective, gram, aIFG – effective, lex, aIFG	–0.26	0.01	4629	–20.3	< 0.001
Effective, lex, aIFG – sham, lex, aIFG	–0.03	0.01	4629	–2.5	0.1