Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jun 13;59(6):3041–3056. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00363

Table 4.

Results of MMPBSA Calculations for Antagonist Ligands Bound to M2R and M3Ra

ΔG(MMPBSA)
structure memopt = 1 memopt = 2 memopt = 3 ΔG(exp.)
M3R (QNB) −28.9 −35.3 −35.7 −13.6
M3R (TIO) −31.6 −32.3 −32.4 −13.3
M3R (C6B) −33.4 −36.0 −36.3 −13.3
M2R(QNB) −46.7 −43.9 −43.9 −13.7
M2R (TIO) −36.8 −36.8 −36.9 −13.5
M2R (C6B)b −38.4 −36.2 −36.5 −10.5
a

MMPBSA calculations were carried out using SANDER in MMPBSA.py for the M2R and M3R test system using the uniform, single dielectric membrane model (memopt = 1), the heterogeneous dielectric membrane model with the PCHIP fitting (memopt = 2), and the heterogeneous dielectric membrane model with the spline fitting (memopt = 3). For the uniform, single dielectric membrane model, the membrane dielectric constant was set to 4 while in all three models the protein dielectric constant was set to 2. The experimental binding free energies were obtained from the literature.54 The antagonist ligand bound to M2R or M3R is listed in parentheses. All binding free energies are reported in units of kcal/mol.

b

This was excluded from Figure 8.