Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2020;127:185–190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04615-6_29

Table 2.

Comparison of the analyzed parameters

CBF (mL/100 g/min) ABPamp (mmHg) ΔCBV (cm3) CAC (cm3/mmHg)
1 Group 1 33.1 ± 12.4 56.5 ± 15.6 2.3 ± 0.7 0.034 ± 0.029
2 Group 2 (ipsilateral sides with CVS) 28.3 ± 15.9 60.4 ± 21.6 2.1 ± 1.1 0.024 ± 0.027
3 Group 2 (ipsilateral sides without CVS) 37.4 ± 20.4 55.7 ± 29.2 2.4 ± 1.2 0.055 ± 0.049
4 Group 2 (contralateral sides with CVS) 29.6 ± 9.8 57.9 ± 17.9 2.2 ± 0.9 0.037 ± 0.029
P (1–2) 0.183 0.563 0.510 0.097
P (1–3) 0.312 0.892 0.764 0.172
P (1–4) 0.215 0.892 0.351 0.34
P (2–4) 0.695 0.616 0.282 0.003a

CVS cerebral vasospasm, CBF cerebral blood flow, ABPamp amplitude of arterial blood pressure, ΔCBV amplitude of regional cerebral blood volume oscillation, cAC cerebral arterial compliance

a

Significant difference (р < 0.01)