Engel 2003.
Methods | Cohort Prospective Cross‐sectional | |
Participants | 299 patients(192 men, 97 women) APE 54, AR 245. Patients with primary rectal cancer identified in The Munich Cancer Registry between 1996‐1998. Patients with metastatic disease excluded. Patients responding to postal questionnaire. Assessment annually for 4 years. Germany. | |
Interventions | Quality of life assessment with EORTC‐C30/CR38. | |
Outcomes | Quality of life | |
Notes | Evidence level: 2B. Not stated: Age, Dukes grade, tumour distance from anal verge, level of anastomosis, formation of pouch. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Prospective cross‐sectional cohort study. Patients identified through Munich Cancer Registry. Not all eligible patients responded to questionnaire. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection | High risk | Blinding not possible due to surgical therapy. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Quality of life | High risk | Out of 329 included patients only 48 completed all questionnaires. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All QoL data reported. |