Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD004323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004323.pub4

Kuzu 2002.

Methods Cohort 
 Retrospective 
 Cross‐sectional.
Participants 126 patients (77 men, 49 women), 75 APE, 51 AR. 
 Cohort of patients treated for rectal cancer between 1987 and 1999. 
 Inclusion criteria: Curative surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma, no other primary malignant tumour, no additional complicating or disabling disease necessitating nursing help, minimum 1 year since surgery, no chemoradiotherapy within the previous four month, no admittance to hospital during study period, no clinical evidence of tumour recurrence. 
 Turkey.
Interventions Quality of life assessment with SF‐36.
Outcomes Quality of life.
Notes Evidence level 2B. 
 Not stated: Tumour distance from anal verge (APE), pouch AR group, radio/chemotherapy.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Retrospective, cross‐sectional cohort study. Rectal cancer patients who had undergone surgery and meet predefined inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Not all eligible patients responded to questionnaire.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection High risk Blinding not possible due to surgical therapy.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Quality of life Low risk All included patients completed the study.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All QoL data reported.