Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD004323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004323.pub4

Campos‐Lobato 2011.

Methods Cohort
Prospective
Cross‐sectional
Participants 153 patients (104 men, 49 women)
APE 68, AR 85
USA
Interventions Quality of life assessment with SF‐36
Outcomes Quality of life
Notes Evidence level: 2B.
Not stated: Dukes grade, level of anastomosis in AR group, pouch in AR group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Prospective, cross‐sectional cohort study. Rectal cancer patients identified through local database. Only patients with documented preoperative overall QoL assessment included
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection High risk Blinding not possible due to surgical therapy.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Quality of life High risk Not all patients completed the questionnaire at all times.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Only overall QoL were reported in the publication