Skip to main content
. 2020 May 4;2020(5):CD011033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011033.pub4

Summary of findings 1. (Oral or intravenous) prostanoid versus aspirin treatment for Buerger's disease.

Intravenous prostacyclin analogue (iloprost) versus oral aspirin for treatment of Buerger's disease
Patient or population: patients with Buerger's disease
Settings: hospital and community
Intervention: intravenous prostacyclin analogue (iloprost)
Comparison: oral aspirin
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects * (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with oral aspirin Risk with intravenous prostacyclin analogue (iloprost)
Ulcer healing
Follow‐up: 28 days
Study population (28 days) RR 2.65 (1.15 to 6.11) 98
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝1,2moderate  
130 per 1000 346 per 1000
(150 to 797)
Complete relief of rest pain
Follow‐up: 28 days
Study population RR 2.28 (1.48 to 3.52) 133
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝1,2moderate  
277 per 1000 631 per 1000
(410 to 975)
Rate of amputation
Follow‐up: 6 months
Study population RR 0.32 (0.09 to 1.15) 95
(1 RCT)
⊕⊕⊕⊝1,2moderate  
182 per 1000 58 per 1000
(16 to 209)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 one single study (doubt about reproducibility of data), downgraded by one level
2 conflict of interest not stated but it was not considered sufficient to downgrade the certainty of evidence