Esato 1995.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: RCT parallel group | |
Participants | Country: Japan Nº patients: 135, 46 with Buerger's disease (21 in clinprost group and 25 in alprostadil group) Setting: not stated Mean age: 61.5 years Gender: not described Inclusion criteria: patients with Buerger's disease and ischaemic ulcer < 1 year or rest pain Exclusion criteria: patients with previous lower limb revascularisation surgery or sympathectomy; contra‐indications for prostaglandin use |
|
Interventions | Treatment: Clinprost group: Lipidious emulsion of TTC‐909 (clinprost, a prostacyclin analogue): 2 ampoules (1 ampoule with TTC‐909 with 1 mL plus 1 ampoule of Lipo PGE1 placebo with 2 mL) completed with saline solution, resulting in 10 mL of solution applied daily, a total dose of 2 mcg, intravenously Alprostadil group: Lipidious emulsion with PGE 1 (alprostadil), 2 ampoules (1 ampoule with Lipo PGE1 with 2 mL plus 1 ampoule of TTC‐909 placebo with 1 mL) completed with saline solution, resulting in 10 mL of solution applied daily, a total dose of 10 mcg, intravenously Duration of treatment: 4 weeks No follow‐up |
|
Outcomes | Primary: improvement of rest pain and ischaemic ulcer Secondary: safety |
|
Notes | Conflict of interest: not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stated, but did not describe methods |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blind |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Doctor responsible for outcome assessment assessed the patients at the start and at the end of treatment, but was not responsible for drug administration |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Adoption of "as‐treated" (per protocol) analyses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | High risk | Absence of patient's smoking history |