Skip to main content
. 2020 May 4;2020(5):CD011033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011033.pub4

Esato 1995.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT parallel group
Participants Country: Japan
Nº patients: 135, 46 with Buerger's disease (21 in clinprost group and 25 in alprostadil group)
Setting: not stated
Mean age: 61.5 years
Gender: not described
Inclusion criteria: patients with Buerger's disease and ischaemic ulcer < 1 year or rest pain
Exclusion criteria: patients with previous lower limb revascularisation surgery or sympathectomy; contra‐indications for prostaglandin use
Interventions Treatment:
Clinprost group: Lipidious emulsion of TTC‐909 (clinprost, a prostacyclin analogue): 2 ampoules (1 ampoule with TTC‐909 with 1 mL plus 1 ampoule of Lipo PGE1 placebo with 2 mL) completed with saline solution, resulting in 10 mL of solution applied daily, a total dose of 2 mcg, intravenously
Alprostadil group: Lipidious emulsion with PGE 1 (alprostadil), 2 ampoules (1 ampoule with Lipo PGE1 with 2 mL plus 1 ampoule of TTC‐909 placebo with 1 mL) completed with saline solution, resulting in 10 mL of solution applied daily, a total dose of 10 mcg, intravenously
Duration of treatment: 4 weeks
No follow‐up
Outcomes Primary: improvement of rest pain and ischaemic ulcer
Secondary: safety
Notes Conflict of interest: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Stated, but did not describe methods
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Double blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Doctor responsible for outcome assessment assessed the patients at the start and at the end of treatment, but was not responsible for drug administration
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Adoption of "as‐treated" (per protocol) analyses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias High risk Absence of patient's smoking history