4. Inconsistency table for the network meta‐analysis: poor outcome at the end of scheduled follow‐up^a.

Comparison	Number of studies	Log direct comparison OR	Log indirect comparison OR	Log difference (95% CI) between direct and indirect comparisons	P value of difference between direct and indirect comparisons
Mixed rehabilitation ward vs GMW	6	‐0.413	‐0.266	‐0.147 (‐0.776 to 0.483)	0.65
Mobile stroke team vs GMW	2	‐0.238	0.032	‐0.270 (‐1.111 to 0.571)	0.53
Stroke ward vs GMW	13	‐0.273	‐0.478	0.205 (‐0.317 to 0.728)	0.44
Mixed rehabilitation ward vs mobile stroke team	0	N/A	‐0.237	N/A	N/A
Mixed rehabilitation ward vs stroke ward	4	0.022	‐0.124	0.146 (‐0.483 to 0.776)	0.65
Mobile stroke team vs stroke ward	1	0.321	0.051	0.270 (‐0.571 to 1.111)	0.53

^aThe table shows the following for each service comparison: number of trials, log direct and indirect comparisons, difference between the two estimates, and P value of that difference. There was no significant inconsistency between direct and indirect estimates.

CI: confidence interval.
GMW: general medical ward.
N/A: not applicable.
OR: odds ratio.