Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;2020(4):CD000197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub4

Comparison 4. Mixed rehabilitation ward versus general medical ward.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
4.1 Poor outcome by the end of scheduled follow‐up 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
4.1.1 Mixed rehabilitation ward vs general medical ward 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
4.2 Death by the end of scheduled follow‐up 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.58, 1.42]
4.2.1 Mixed rehabilitation ward vs general medical ward 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.58, 1.42]
4.3 Death or institutional care by the end of scheduled follow‐up 5 578 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.51, 0.99]
4.3.1 Mixed rehabilitation ward vs general medical ward 5 578 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.51, 0.99]
4.4 Death or dependency by the end of scheduled follow‐up 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
4.4.1 Mixed rehabilitation ward vs general medical ward 6 630 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
4.5 Length of stay (days) in a hospital or institution 3 387 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.85 [‐13.49, 21.18]
4.5.1 Mixed rehabilitation ward vs general ward 3 387 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.85 [‐13.49, 21.18]