Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;2020(4):CD000197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub4

New York 1962.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants People with stroke up to 2 months after stroke
Appropriate for rehabilitation centre
Interventions Mixed rehabilitation team working in rehabilitation centre or attending participants in other wards (n = 42) vs programme of care in general ward (n = 40) that had some specialist nursing input
Organised care provided for months if required
Outcomes Functional status and place of residence at end of follow‐up (approximately 1 year)
Notes No deaths reported
Minor anomaly in published data table
Not clear how many participants were managed in a peripatetic way
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly drawn unmarked envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear