Giles 1996.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT. Cross‐over design (2‐week washout period). Location: single centre in USA. Duration: 4 weeks of treatment followed by 2‐week washout and then 4 weeks of alternative treatment; follow‐up not stated. |
|
Participants | 14 participants. Age and sex of the participants was unspecified, but as parents were also questioned it would suggest they were concerned with a paediatric population. | |
Interventions | PD&P versus flutter. 2x daily for 15 min each treatment. | |
Outcomes | Participant preference, wet and dry sputum weight, FVC and FEV1 were measured pre‐study baseline and at the end of each treatment period. Sputum collected on the last treatment of each treatment period. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Parents were also questioned therefore it may be reasonable to assume that they may have influenced the children's decision as to preference. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |