Hansen 1990.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT. Cross‐over design. Location: single centre in USA. Duration: not defined. |
|
Participants | 5 participants. Age and sex of participants not stated. | |
Interventions | HFCWO versus CPT. 30 sessions of each therapy lasting same duration, but duration of treatment was not defined. | |
Outcomes | Sputum weight. Primarily looking at the pressure and frequencies generated by the vest and the mucus collection was an aside. Measured before and after duration of intervention (30 days). | |
Notes | In addition a gentleman not wanting to be included in the study used the Vest® for 12 months and experienced a significant increase in his RFTs and restoration of ventilation to the upper lobes of his chest on scanning. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomised, but method not discussed. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Only reporting of respiratory function was descriptive of the man not included in the study. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | None identified. |