Hare 2002.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Quasi‐RCT (alternate assignment). Parallel design. Location: single centre in USA. Duration: 2 weeks. |
|
Participants | 14 participants (10 males, 4 females). Age 8 ‐ 28 years. All participants admitted to hospital for 2‐week course of IV antibiotics, acute. No complications identified, no difference between groups in terms of clinical score, but clinical score not defined. | |
Interventions | Percussive device (IPV) versus CPT, not stated how many participants were randomised to each treatment group 4 times per day for 2 weeks. | |
Outcomes | FVC, FEV1 and FEF25-75 and RV. Participant‐reported satisfaction was noted. Measurements taken at admission and discharge. | |
Notes | Abstract only, no full paper. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomised, but no further details given. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Alternate assignment. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Clinical score was used as an outcome measure but no clear definition of this parameter given. Significant differences were suggested but no data provided to support this. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Supported by Vortran Medical Technology 1, Inc., Sacramento, CA. |