Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;2020(4):CD006842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006842.pub5

Hare 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods Quasi‐RCT (alternate assignment).
Parallel design.
Location: single centre in USA.
Duration: 2 weeks.
Participants 14 participants (10 males, 4 females).
Age 8 ‐ 28 years.
All participants admitted to hospital for 2‐week course of IV antibiotics, acute.
No complications identified, no difference between groups in terms of clinical score, but clinical score not defined.
Interventions Percussive device (IPV) versus CPT, not stated how many participants were randomised to each treatment group
4 times per day for 2 weeks.
Outcomes FVC, FEV1 and FEF25-75 and RV. Participant‐reported satisfaction was noted. Measurements taken at admission and discharge.
Notes Abstract only, no full paper.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised, but no further details given.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Alternate assignment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Clinical score was used as an outcome measure but no clear definition of this parameter given. Significant differences were suggested but no data provided to support this.
Other bias Unclear risk Supported by Vortran Medical Technology 1, Inc., Sacramento, CA.