Kluft 1996.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Quasi‐RCT (alternate allocation). Cross‐over design. Location: single centre in USA. Duration: 8 days (treatments alternating daily for 4 days). |
|
| Participants | 29 participants (15 males, 14 females). Age range 7 ‐ 47 years. Diagnosis of CF and clinical evidence of chronic disease. | |
| Interventions | 3x daily 30 min CPT/PD versus 3x daily 30 min HFCWO. Participants continued to receive their standard bronchodilators prior to therapies. | |
| Outcomes | Sputum weight (wet and dry). Each participant provided 3 samples per day for 4 days and all 12 samples were used to calculate the means and standard deviations. | |
| Notes | 1 individual not enrolled due to intolerance of HFCWO, although had met the inclusion criteria ‐ never really entered the study therefore not really a drop out. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Initially randomly assigned, but method not stated then treatment assignments alternating daily. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Alternate. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 1 individual not enrolled due to intolerance of HFCWO, although had met the inclusion criteria ‐ never really entered the trial therefore not really a drop out. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Potential adverse effects were identified but none occurred. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |