Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 19;103(6):2225–2233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03463.x

Table 2.

 MS2 and T1 L reduction during alkaline stabilization at 28°C

Time (h) Average viral concentration (log10 total PFU ± SE)* Significant§
MS2 PBS control T1 L PBS control T1 L sludge control MS2 sludge control T1 L sludge stabilization MS2 sludge stabilization
0 6·98 ± 0·03 6·20 ± 0·16 6·31 ± 0·04 5·92 ± 0·04 6·31 ± 0·04 5·92 ± 0·04
0·1 –† 6·28 ± 0·03 5·88 ± 0·06 1·70 ± 0·29 0 No
2 6·18 ± 0·09 5·71 ± 0·05 0·52 ± 0·26 0 No
12 6·12 ± 0·17 5·68 ± 0·06 0 0 No
24 6·76 ± 0·08 6·04 ± 0·06 6·01 ± 0·12 4·75 ± 0·62 0 0 No
Reduction‡ 0·22 ± 0·11 0·15 ± 0·22 0·30 ± 0·46 1·18 ± 0·83 6·31 ± 0·59 5·92 ± 0·04 No

*Average concentration of target virus ± SE from three trials under the following conditions: PBS control (virus spiked PBS, pH 7), sludge control (virus spiked in 4% TS sludge, pH 7), sludge stabilization (virus spiked into 4% TS sludge, treated with 8% (w/v) Ca(OH)2, pH 12 for 2 h then 11·5 an additional 22 h).

†Sample not tested (–).

‡Average total reduction of target virus, including loss because of experimental conditions, during three trials of stabilization ± SE.

§Significant difference between square root transformed viral concentrations of the test beakers at each time point determined by T‐HSD, P ≤ 0·05.