Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 19;103(6):2225–2233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03463.x

Table 3.

 MS2 and T1 L reduction during alkaline stabilization at 4°C

Time (h) Average viral concentration (log10 total PFU ± SE)* Significant§
MS2 PBS control T1 L PBS control T1 L sludge control MS2 sludge control T1 L sludge stabilization MS2 sludge stabilization
0 6·78 ± 0·09 6·0 ± 0·18 5·65 ± 0·15 5·99 ± 0·11 5·65 ± 0·15 5·99 ± 0·11
0·1 –† 5·57 ± 0·14 5·79 ± 0·10 2·43 ± 0·62 1·63 ± 0·33 No
2 5·46 ± 0·13 5·64 ± 0·18 1·42 ± 0·12 0·75 ± 0·75 No
12 5·33 ± 0·08 5·11 ± 0·69 0 0·59 ± 0·59 No
24 6·72 ± 0·06 5·96 ± 0·18 5·29 ± 0·21 4·89 ± 0·57 0 0 No
Reduction‡ 0·06 ± 0·14 0·04 ± 0·36 0·37 ± 0·71 1·10 ± 1·65 5·65 ± 0·89 5·99 ± 1·79 No

*Average concentration of target virus ± SE from three trials under the following conditions: PBS control (virus spiked PBS, pH 7), sludge control (virus spiked in 4% TS sludge, pH 7), sludge stabilization (virus spiked into 4% TS sludge, treated with 8% (w/v) Ca(OH)2, pH 12 for 2 h then 11·5 an additional 22 h).

†Sample not tested (–).

‡Average total reduction of target virus, including loss because of experimental conditions, during three trials of stabilization ± SE.

§Significant difference between square root transformed viral concentrations of the test beakers at each time point determined by T‐HSD, P ≤ 0·05.