Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 19;103(6):2225–2233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03463.x

Table 5.

 MS2 and HM‐175 reduction during alkaline stabilization at 4°C

Time (h) Average viral concentration (log10 total PFU ± SE)* Significant§
MS2 PBS control HM‐175 PBS control HM‐175 sludge control MS2 sludge control HM‐175 sludge stabilization MS2 sludge stabilization
0 6·27 ± 0·15 6·82 ± 0·03 6·32 ± 0·06 5·19 ± 0·07 6·32 ± 0·06 5·19 ± 0·07
0·1 –† 6·32 ± 0·02 5·13 ± 0·08 5·44 ± 0·31 2·48 ± 0·05 Yes
2 6·20 ± 0·06 3·81 ± 0·02 5·22 ± 0·39 2·21 ± 0·21 Yes
12 6·13 ± 0·08 3·67 ± 0·06 4·26 ± 0·18 1·85 ± 0·29 No
24 6·20 ± 0·17 6·66 ± 0·05 5·97 ± 0·10 3·50 ± 0·13 1·20 ± 1·20 0 No
Reduction‡ 0·07 ± 0·32 0·16 ± 0·08 0·35 ± 0·42 1·68 ± 0·37 5·12 ± 2·13 5·19 ± 0·63 No

*Average concentration of target virus ± SE from three trials under the following conditions: PBS control (virus spiked PBS, pH 7), sludge control (virus spiked in 4% TS sludge, pH 7), sludge stabilization (virus spiked into 4% TS sludge, treated with 8% (w/v) Ca(OH)2, pH 12 for 2 h then 11·5 an additional 22 h).

†Sample not tested (–).

‡Average total reduction of target virus, including loss because of experimental conditions, during three trials of stabilization ± SE.

§Significant difference between square root transformed viral concentrations of the test beakers at each time point determined by T‐HSD, P ≤ 0·05.