Table 3.

Linear regression results for behavioral economic variables of relative reinforcing value of alcohol-related activities (reinforcement ratio), alcohol demand composite variables of persistence and amplitude, and impulsive choice ratio (ICR) as a measure of delay discounting.

	SFAS M (SD)	HE M (SD)	B (SE)	[95% CI]	p	Between Group (d)
Reinforcement Ratio
Treatment (HE = 0; SFAS = 1)	0.28 (.33)	0.45 (.25)	−0.61 (.29)	[−1.08, −0.14]	.032*	0.58
Baseline reinforcement ratio			1.36 (.52)	[−0.51, 2.22]
Persistence
Treatment (HE = 0, SFAS = 1)	−0.31 (.78)	0.33 (.93)	−0.77 (.28)	[−1.23, −0.31]	.006**	0.74
Baseline persistence			0.06 (.20)	[−0.27, 0.38]
Amplitude
Treatment (HE = 0, SFAS = 1)	−0.23 (.91)	0.29 (.80)	−0.60 (.30)	[−1.10, −0.11]	.046*	0.61
Baseline amplitude			0.03 (.20)	[−0.31, 0.36]
Delay Discounting
Treatment (HE = 0; SFAS = 1)	0.58 (.24)	0.51 (.28)	0.26 (.30)	[−0.24, 0.76]	.397	0.27
Baseline ICR			1.86 (.54)	[0.98, 2.75]

Note. AUD = Alcohol Use Disorder. SFAS = Substance-Free Activity Session condition. HE = Health Education condition.

^*p <.05.

^**<.01