Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;11:474. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00474

TABLE 7.

Details of the significant SNPs associated with ASI, Pht, Eht, EPO, EPP, and SEN under optimum and low N managements using the FarmCPU model with a Bonferroni threshold of P < 0.05.

Trait SNP Chr. Position P-value MAF Effect
ASI_Opt S1_274946693 1 274946693 2.08E-07 0.08 –0.21
S2_6636633 2 6636633 4.99E-09 0.17 0.17
S2_54204647 2 54204647 2.82E-08 0.44 0.11
S3_128687310 3 128687310 8.68E-10 0.33 0.16
S4_235073935 4 235073935 4.22E-08 0.06 0.22
S5_195672028 5 195672028 4.59E-14 0.07 0.37
S7_24409023 7 24409023 3.88E-12 0.25 0.18
S7_155590511 7 155590511 8.19E-08 0.22 0.12
S8_136094451 8 136094451 5.01E-10 0.26 –0.14
S9_118046290 9 118046290 7.10E-08 0.22 0.13
S10_33353122 10 33353122 2.32E-09 0.16 –0.20
ASI_LowN S1_5810155 1 5810155 3.93E-08 0.19 0.17
S2_226325975 2 226325975 1.54E-07 0.29 –0.15
S3_32033690 3 32033690 1.58E-07 0.49 0.13
S3_147401613 3 147401613 1.06E-08 0.43 –10.15
S4_37297564 4 37297564 1.68E-07 0.22 –0.16
S6_164497574 6 164497574 9.27E-09 0.27 0.16
S10_4586049 10 4586049 6.45E-09 0.48 –0.16
Pht_Opt S3_64819581 3 64819581 1.62E-07 0.06 3.46
S4_46166070 4 46166070 7.98E-08 0.37 –1.69
S4_184955101 4 184955101 3.98E-08 0.25 2.10
S7_6297685 7 6297685 5.22E-12 0.26 –2.77
S10_143502717 10 143502717 1.61E-07 0.16 2.19
Pht_LowN S1_17679579 1 17679579 4.65E-08 0.10 2.32
S3_199254673 3 199254673 1.88E-13 0.21 –3.54
S4_237693358 4 237693358 2.59E-07 0.12 2.50
S8_25351243 8 25351243 1.05E-07 0.32 –1.48
Eht_Opt S2_140662928 2 140662928 2.44E-07 0.27 –1.71
S8_158098622 8 158098622 7.18E-09 0.37 1.75
Eht_LowN S1_16698847 1 16698847 2.94E-12 0.12 –2.55
S1_199339693 1 199339693 1.60E-08 0.06 1.92
S1_274946693 1 274946693 3.84E-09 0.08 –2.31
S2_196870448 2 196870448 1.54E-08 0.11 1.63
S3_217796834 3 217796834 7.05E-08 0.15 1.37
S5_83133270 5 83133270 5.66E-10 0.06 2.60
S6_7046560 6 7046560 4.63E-09 0.24 –1.26
S7_40379325 7 40379325 4.01E-08 0.21 1.23
S10_126687226 10 126687226 1.81E-10 0.07 2.24
S10_145097517 10 145097517 2.10E-08 0.33 1.17
EPO_Opt S1_71065792 1 71065792 1.76E-07 0.07 0.01
S6_97945994 6 97945994 1.47E-08 0.09 0.01
S8_72067641 8 72067641 2.88E-09 0.37 0.00
S10_143712477 10 143712477 2.71E-08 0.08 0.01
EPO_LowN S1_207055175 1 207055175 1.37E-07 0.22 0.00
S1_274946693 1 274946693 3.01E-09 0.08 –0.01
S1_285229689 1 285229689 2.52E-10 0.42 –0.01
S2_33350339 2 33350339 8.02E-10 0.33 0.00
S6_97945994 6 97945994 4.75E-11 0.09 0.01
S10_123956017 10 123956017 6.75E-09 0.13 0.01
EPP_LowN S1_122756821 1 122756821 2.54E-08 0.47 –0.01
S4_174009677 4 174009677 1.17E-07 0.07 –0.02
S5_188825516 5 188825516 1.01E-07 0.18 –0.01
S10_148304779 10 148304779 1.33E-07 0.31 0.01
SEN_Opt S1_220067760 1 220067760 3.46E-09 0.47 –0.08
S4_177150249 4 177150249 1.53E-08 0.19 0.10
S5_8351127 5 8351127 1.02E-07 0.45 –0.08
S8_159648136 8 159648136 2.12E-07 0.24 –0.08
S9_153449703 9 153449703 1.70E-08 0.47 –0.08

Where MAF is the Minor Allele Frequency, effect is the Allele Effect, and P-value is for the mixed linear model’ ASI, anthesis-silking interval; PH, plant height; EH, ear height; EPO, ear position; EPP, ears per plant; and SEN, senescence under optimum (Opt), and low N stress (Low N) conditions.