Table 5.
Association between DED and OW‐O in Mexican adolescents with plausible reports of energy (ENSANUT 2012)
| DED (n = 749) | OR | CI 95% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1a | |||
| Low DED (T1) | |||
| Medium DED (T2) | 0.748 | [0.395, 1.419] | 0.374 |
| High DED (T3) | 0.830 | [0.464, 1.484] | 0.529 |
| Model 2 Adjustedb | |||
| Low DED (T1) | |||
| Medium DED (T2) | 0.965 | [0.498, 1.868] | 0.885 |
| High DED (T3) | 1.829 | [0.498, 1.868] | 0.068 |
| Model 3c | |||
| Continuous DED | 0.996 | [0.989, 1.002] | 0.224 |
| Model 4 Adjustedd | |||
| DED adjusted | 1.005 | [0.988, 1.013] | 0.150 |
Note. DED: Dietary energy density; ENSANUT 2012: 2012 Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio. ORs were obtained through logistic regression models using overweight or obese dichotomously and the low DED tertiles as reference. Overweight or obese was defined as BMI‐for‐age > 1 SD based on the WHO Reference 2007 (22). Models were restricted to plausible reporters (n = 749).
Bivariate.
Adjusted by age, sex, region, rural or urban residence, socio‐economic status, energy from sugar‐sweetened beverages and fibre.
Continuous DED.
Adjusted by age, sex, region, rural or urban residence, socio‐economic status, energy from sugar‐sweetened beverages, and fibre.