Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 24;15(1):e12656. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12656

Table 3.

Determinants of binary dietary diversity outcomes (odds ratios)

Number of food groups
5 or more 4 or more 3 or more Any ASFs Any MnD‐FFVs
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Wealth quintile 1.432 *** (0.169) 1.341 ** (0.154) 1.446 *** (0.186) 1.285 ** (0.120) 1.267 * (0.149)
Knowledge (all) 1.395 (1.336) 2.667 (3.372) 2.338 (3.274) 0.494 (0.635) 0.562 (0.688)
Livestock 0.929 (0.151) 0.959 (0.109) 1.000 (0.122) 1.211 (0.177) 0.943 (0.0708)
Garden 0.414 *** (0.119) 0.720 (0.251) 1.362 (0.420) 0.896 (0.325) 4.019 *** (1.535)
Education (years) 1.071 (0.0608) 1.040 (0.0418) 0.968 (0.0482) 1.002 (0.0475) 1.118 ** (0.0510)
Age 1.014 (0.0280) 0.997 (0.0236) 0.945 *** (0.0135) 0.983 (0.0220) 0.987 (0.0230)
District fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 248 248 248 248 248
F test 3.553 2.232 3.433 3.334 4.780
Prob > F 0.0102 0.0695 0.0120 0.0137 0.00213

Note. Nutrition knowledge index defined as per cent answered correctly (out of all questions, behaviours and mechanisms combined) of the questions that were answered correctly by 10–90% of respondents, normalized to the 95th percentile. Wealth is quintiles of an asset‐based index. Livestock measured in TLUs. Education is years of schooling. Age measured in years. Constant terms not shown. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors clustered at the care group level shown in parentheses, with significance levels denoted. ASFs: animal‐source foods; MnD‐FFVs: micronutrient‐dense fruits and vegetables; TLUs: tropical livestock units.

Bold used to emphasize results discussed in the paper.

*

P < 0.1.

**

P < 0.05.

***

P < 0.01.