Table 2.
Author(s), and Year | Primary Outcomes | Secondary Outcomes | Summary of Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Anitasari & Andrajati, 2017 | •Intake of iron supplements by pregnant women measured by MMAS‐8 score | •Haemoglobin (Hb) level (g/dL) |
•Low adherence to iron supplementation as measured by MMAS‐8 score (>2): SMS group: 76.3% of women before intervention; 71.1% of women after interventionLeaflet group: 66.7% of women before intervention; 58.3% of women after intervention •High adherence to iron supplementation as measured by MMAS‐8 score (=0): SMS group: 5.3% of women before intervention; 7.9% of women after the intervention Leaflet group: 13.9% of women before intervention; 16.7% of women after intervention •Percentage of women with Hb level ≥11 g/dL: SMS group: 47.22% before intervention; 52.78% after intervention Leaflet group: 55.26% before intervention; 57.69% after intervention •Percent of women with Hb level of 10.9 g/dL–10.0 g/dL: SMS intervention: 36.11% before intervention; 22.22% after intervention Leaflet intervention: 23.68% before intervention; 28.95% after intervention |
Bangal et al., 2017 | •Percentage of pregnant women who received prophylactic iron and calcium tablets for minimum 3 months |
•Total weight gain during pregnancy (kg) •Birth weight of baby •Need for parenteral and blood transfusion •Attended four antenatal visits |
•Iron and calcium supplementation for more than 3 months: Intervention group 81%; control group 69% (chi square test p < 0.0001) •Satisfactory weight gain (>10 kg): Intervention group 35.00%; control group 25.00% •Anaemia: Intervention group 36%; control group 45% (chi square test p = 0.0119) •Need for blood transfusion: intervention group 0%; control group 3.00% •Need for parenteral iron therapy: Intervention group 2%; control group 5% •The proportion of low birth weight babies: Intervention group 30%; control group 35% •Antenatal visits (≤4): Intervention group 42.5%, control group 76.5% (chi square test p < 0.0001) |
Fedha, 2014 | •Percentage of pregnant women who received prophylactic iron and/or vitamin supplements •Percentage of pregnant women who received dietary counselling |
•Number of antenatal visits attended •Percentage of intra‐uterine fetal deaths •Percentage of neonatal deaths •Percentage of infants that cried after birth (e.g., immediately, after 5 min, after 10 min) |
•Receive vitamin supplements: Intervention group 39.8%; control group 23.8% (p = 0.001) •Receive iron supplements: Intervention group 91.6%; control group 87.4% (p = 0.170) •Receive diet counselling: intervention group 95%; control group 89.3% (p = 0.027) •Attend less than 4 antenatal visits: intervention group 3.6%; control group 9.7% •Intra uterine fetal death: Intervention group 1%, control group 1.5% (p = 0.715) •Neonatal deaths: Intervention group 1%, control group 3.4% (p = 0.269)the proportion of infants who cried immediately at birth: Intervention group 97.4% and control group 95.6% (p = 0.765). |
Pai et al., 2013 | •Adherence to taking iron supplements | •Hb level (g/dL) |
•Average Hb levels decreased slightly (by 0.10 g/dL) in the control group but increased (by 0.32 g/dL) in the intervention group. •Taking into account the difference of the differences Hb levels of the intervention group improved by 0.43 g/dL (95% CI = −0.13–0.98) more than the control group (p = 0.13). |
Note. SMS: short message service.