Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):e15704. doi: 10.2196/15704

Table 4.

Matrix of integrated qualitative and quantitative data for Actigraph GT9X Link (this device was used as an example).

Outcome of
interest
Quantitative result, median (IQR); min-max Qualitative result Convergence;
discrepancy; silence
Comfort
  • Midpoint of the Likert scale for perceived comfort (acceptability questionnaire): 3.3 (1.3); 2.0-5.3

  • Somewhat comfortable

  • Unanimously agreed that the device was too big

  • For some, along with excessive strap length, the device irritated them to the point of being uncomfortable

  • Others felt that despite the size, the device was nonetheless comfortable

Convergence
Perceived
usefulness
  • Midpoint for interest (IMIa): 3.5 (1.4); 2.3-5.3

  • Midpoint for usefulness (IMI): 4.9 (2.5); 3.0-5.5

  • Midpoint for effort/importance (IMI): 3.3 (2.9); 2.0-5.8

  • OK usability (SUSb): 60.0 (15.6); 50.0-67.5

  • High perceived usefulness (acceptability questionnaire): 4.5 (2.7); 3.3-6.0

  • Midpoint enjoyment (acceptability questionnaire): 3.7 (1.5); 2.7-4.7

  • Step count was both interesting and useful

  • Further feedback was desired

  • Device was considered boring due to its limited functionality

  • Dual function as a watch appreciated

Convergence
Ease of use
  • High perceptions of competence (IMI): 6.7 (3.2); 2.7-7.0

  • Midpoint for perceived effort (acceptability questionnaire): 3.8 (3.0); 3.0-6.0

  • Midpoint for effort/importance (IMI): 3.3 (2.9); 2.0-5.8

  • Participants felt that the device was simple to use, as there was little to no interaction required with it

  • Limited difficulties reported

Partial convergence
Likelihood
of wearing a
device
  • Low pressure to wear (IMI): 1.3 (2.0); 1.0-3.3

  • High perceived choice (IMI): 6.9 (0.9); 6.0-7.0

  • Midpoint behavioral intentions (acceptability questionnaire): 3.5 (1.4); 1.0-6.0

  • Midpoint psychological attachments (acceptability questionnaire): 3.8 (2.1); 1.5-6.0

  • Low facilitating conditions (acceptability questionnaire): 2.5 (4.8); 1.0-6.0

  • Participants were unclear whether this was a device suitable for long-term use

  • The limited functionality is a plus for some and a barrier to others

  • Almost everyone willing to wear it for science or if instructed by a health care professional

  • Outside of a trial, the device was considered too bulky for long-term use

  • Participants became used to it as the trial progressed; with many preferring it to other tested devices

Partial convergence

aIMI: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.

bSUS: System Usability Scale.