Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Couns Psychol. 2019 Dec 16;47(5):796–819. doi: 10.1177/0011000019891434

Table 2.

SOMA Descriptive Statistics and Interrater Reliabilities

Dimension 1 2 3 4 5

Patient
 1. Engagement --
 2. Trust 0.45** --
Provider
 3. Engagement 0.12 −0.01 --
 4. Trust 0.07 0.32* 0.65*** --
5. Patient-Provider Concordance 0.46** 0.58*** 0.13 0.28 --
M 2.08 1.42 0.92 1.40 1.26
SD 0.82 1.15 0.85 0.83 1.02
Skewness −0.54 −0.62 0.20 −0.56 −0.57
Kurtosis −0.74 1.35 0.15 1.47 −0.00
Minimum, Maximum 0, +3 −2, +3 −1, +3 −1, +3 −1, +3
ICC 0.94a 0.89a 0.79b 0.82b 0.92c

Notes. Ns = 33 (descriptive statistics), 16–23 (reliabilities). SOMA ratings can range from −3 (extremely problematic) to +3 (extremely strong), where 0 = unremarkable or neutral. ICC = Intraclass correlation coefficient.

a

Team 1 (3 raters).

b

Team 2 (2 raters).

c

Teams 1 and 2 (5 raters).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

p = .065.