Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 Aug 7;17(2):536–546. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2864262

Table 1.

Performance comparison between VRN, CAE and MEN. The average of three metrics on all slices are presented.

one slice missing two slices missing partial slice missing
MSE SSIM PSNR MSE SSIM PSNR MSE SSIM PSNR
VRN train 1.42 0.87 23.30 2.07 0.81 20.78 0.54 0.94 29.28
test 1.32 0.88 23.21 1.98 0.82 20.29 0.50 0.94 28.88
CAE train 2.10 0.81 21.77 3.30 0.75 19.59 0.82 0.93 27.80
test 1.82 0.83 21.39 2.87 0.79 19.28 0.73 0.92 27.96
MEN train 2.71 0.82 18.80 4.71 0.75 18.09 1.02 0.93 26.97
test 2.31 0.86 18.78 3.81 0.79 17.82 0.88 0.94 27.36