Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;2020(5):CD011941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011941.pub2

5. Treatment‐related adverse events.

Study Intervention       Comparators       P value1
  Description A/R Type Events Description A/R Type Events  
Arnold 2001 Salt bath + UVB 16/20 Burning erythema 2 Psoralen bath + UVA 17/20 Burning erythema 2 1.0
Brockow 2007a Salt bath + UVB 79/81 Dermatitis solaris 2 UVB 71/79 Dermatitis solaris 1 1.0
Brockow 2007b Salt bath + UVB 76/81 3 x phototoxic reaction
1 × burning/stinging
4 UVB 53/83 2x phototoxic reaction
3x dermatitis solaris
5 0.4861
Dawe 2005 Salt bath + UVB 41/60 arms or legs 3 x itching,
2 x stinging
1 x itchy papular eruption
6 UVB 41/60 arms or legs n.a. 0 < 0.0257
Gambichler 2001 Salt bath + UVB 10/10 elbows n.a. 0 Tap water + UVB 10/10 elbows n.a. 0 1.0
Klein 2011 Salt bath + UVB 180/183 'Definite' or 'probable' events 21 UVB 179/184 'Definite' or 'probable' events 11 0.0943
Leaute‐Labreze 2001 Salt bath + UVB 24/24 Itching and burning in most cases 12 UVB 21/21 Itching and burning in most cases 7 0.3661
Schiener 2007 Salt bath + UVB 284/310 Phototoxic reactions 33 UVB 252/301 Phototoxic reactions 31 0.894
Tap water + UVB 266/301 Phototoxic reactions 19 0.0809
Psoralen bath + UVA 297/321 Phototoxic reactions 16 0.0072
Grade IV or V erythemas 3 UVB 252/301 Grade IV or V erythemas 1 0.6263
Tap water + UVB 266/301 Grade IV or V erythemas 2 1.0
Psoralen bath + UVA 297/321 Grade IV or V erythemas 5 0.7252
Oedema2 n.r. n.r. n.r. Oedema2 n.r. n.a.
Blisters2 n.r. n.r. n.r. Blisters2 n.r. n.a.

1: Estimated by review authors using Easy Fisher Exact Test Calculator (Social Science Statistics 2018); statistically signifiant P values (P < 0.05) in bold font.

2: Schiener 2007 reported seven patients who developed edema and four who developed blisters, but the adverse events were not linked to a treatment group.

A/R: number of analyzed/randomized people or limbs; n.a.: not applicable; n.r.: not reported; UVA: artivicial ultraviolet A light; UVB: artificial ultraviolet B light