Stanley 2017.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 12‐month trial with 4 arms
Duration of trial: 12 months Country: USA Setting: inpatient |
|
Participants |
Method of recruitment of participants: recruited from emergency departments, clinician referrals and advertisements. Recruitment period ended 6 months prior to study end date.
Sample size: 86 Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder: not stated Means of assessment: not stated Age: not stated Sex: not stated Comorbidity: not stated Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Experimental group
Treatment name: DBT + fluoxetine
Number randomised to group: 18
Duration: 12 months Control/comparison group 1 Comparison name: DBT + placebo Number randomised to group: 19 Duration: 12 months Control/comparison group 2 Comparison name: supportive therapy + fluoxetine Number randomised to group: 20 Duration: 12 months Control/comparison group 3 Comparison name: supportive therapy + placebo Number randomised to group: 18 Duration: 12 months All groups Concomitant psychotherapy: not stated Concomitant pharmacotherapy: all participants were washed out of psychotropic medications and received fluoxetine or placebo, depending on randomisation (50% of each group received fluoxetine or placebo). Benzodiazapines were permitted for sleep. Proportions of participants taking standing psychotropic medication during trial observation period: 50% of each group were taking fluoxetine. |
|
Outcomes |
Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes |
Sample size calculation: not stated
Ethics approval: not stated Comments from review authors:
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no clear information on randomisation method was provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no clear information on allocation concealment was provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: dropout rates were even across groups, total rates were around ¼ of participants; no information provided on ITT, but all randomised participants were analysed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: NCT00533117: no apparent bias |
Other bias | Unclear risk |
Treatment adherence Comment: adherence not stated Attention bias Comment: equal treatment in four groups Allegiance bias Comment: nothing found |