Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;2020:3948183. doi: 10.1155/2020/3948183

Table 5.

Association between PRDX expression and OS in GC patients with different treatment strategies.

PRDXs Treatment strategies Cases Low High HR (95% CI) P value
PRDX1 Surgery alone 380 190 190 0.76 (0.57–1.01) 0.057
5-FU-based adjuvant 153 76 77 1.21 (0.86–1.71) 0.268
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 0.67 (0.27–1.64) 0.374

PRDX2 Surgery alone 380 190 190 0.72 (0.54–0.96) 0.025
5-FU-based adjuvant 153 76 77 0.68 (0.48–0.97) 0.030
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 0.61 (0.25–1.50) 0.276

PRDX3 Surgery alone 380 190 190 0.74 (0.55–0.99) 0.038
5-FU-based adjuvant 153 76 77 1.20 (0.85–1.69) 0.296
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 0.94 (0.39–2.26) 0.883

PRDX4 Surgery alone 380 190 190 0.85 (0.64–1.14) 0.275
5-FU-based adjuvant 153 76 77 0.78 (0.56–1.11) 0.164
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 1.01 (0.42–2.43) 0.990

PRDX5 Surgery alone 380 191 189 0.82 (0.62–1.10) 0.187
5-FU-based adjuvant 34 17 17 0.94 (0.38–2.33) 0.893
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 0.48 (0.19–1.20) 0.110

PRDX6 Surgery alone 380 190 190 1.04 (0.78–1.38) 0.795
5-FU-based adjuvant 153 76 77 0.98 (0.70–1.38) 0.913
Other adjuvants 76 38 38 1.16 (0.48–2.80) 0.738