Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;94(2):514–522. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9834

Table 3.

Growth performance of pigs infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus, porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) virus, or co-infection

P-value
Parameter Control1 PRRS2 PED2 PRP2 SEM Overall PRRS3 PED4 Interaction5
0–14 d performance
    ADG, kg 0.62a 0.35b 0.61a 0.41b 0.03 <0.001 <0.001 0.506 0.322
    ADFI, kg 0.95a 0.67b 0.94a 0.76b 0.05 0.001 <0.001 0.441 0.354
    G:F, kg/kg 0.65a 0.53b 0.65a 0.55ab 0.03 0.020 0.003 0.861 0.746
15–21 d performance
    ADG, kg 0.66a 0.63a 0.35b 0.20b 0.04 <0.001 0.083 <0.001 0.229
    ADFI, kg 1.22a 1.02a 0.88ab 0.67b 0.07 0.003 0.026 <0.001 0.969
    G:F, kg/kg 0.54ab 0.62a 0.39bc 0.31c 0.05 0.001 1.000 <0.001 0.133
0–21 d performance
    ADG, kg 0.63a 0.44b 0.51ab 0.34c 0.04 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.797
    ADFI, kg 1.04a 0.78b 0.92ab 0.73b 0.04 0.002 <0.001 0.076 0.508
    G:F, kg/kg 0.61a 0.56a 0.56a 0.47b 0.02 0.005 0.006 0.008 0.456

a–cTreatments with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

1 n = 3 pens per treatment; healthy, virus naïve.

2 n = 6 pens per treatment. PRRS = PRRS virus infected; PED = PED virus infected; PRP = PRRS+PED coinfection.

3Main effects of PRRS effect (control and PED vs. PRRS and PRP).

4Main effects of PED effect (control and PRRS vs. PED and PRP).

5Interaction of PRRS and PED (control and PRP vs. PRRS and PED).