Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;95(3):1170–1178. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0961

Table 4.

Influence of processed porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV)–inoculated feed on quantitative reverse transcription PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of feed, fecal swabs, and cecum contents of pigs, Exp. 21

Fecal swabs, Ct
Item KSU2 feed inoculum, Ct 0 dpi3 2 dpi 4 dpi 6 dpi 7 dpi 7 dpi cecum content, Ct
Processed feed, % positive4
    Negative 5
    37.8°C 100.0 (9/9) (1/9) (3/9) (3/9) (3/9) (3/9)
    46.1°C 100.0 (9/9) (3/9) (3/9) (3/9) (3/9) (3/9)
    54.4°C 100.0 (9/9)
    62.8°C 88.9 (8/9)
    71.1°C 88.9 (8/9)
Processed feed, Ct values6
    Negative
    37.8°C 32.5a 15.8 27.5 16.6 17.8 16.9
    46.1°C 34.6b 24.5 15.2 15.4 17.9 18.8
    54.4°C 37.0c
    62.8°C 36.5c
    71.1°C 36.7c

a–cMeans within a column with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

1500 mL of tissue culture containing 4.5 · 106 tissue culture infectious dose [TCID]50 (the concentration used to see cytopathic effect in 50% of the cells)/mL of PEDV was inoculated into a 4.5 kg batch of feed and then added to 45 kg of PEDV-negative feed to form the positive treatment. One feed sample per temperature per replicate · 3 replicates was collected, divided into 3 aliquots, and diluted in PBS to form supernatants. Therefore, each feed supernatant value per treatment represents the mean of 3 replicates · 3 repetitions.

2KSU = Kansas State University (Manhattan, KS).

3dpi = days after inoculation.

4Means represent the percent of samples that had detectible RNA by PEDV quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis (<45 Ct).

5No detectible PEDV RNA (Ct >45).

6Mean Ct value of samples with detectible PEDV RNA below 45.