Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul;95(7):2838–2847. doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1524

Table 5.

The P-values and least squares means (SE) for the effect of WUR10000125 (WUR) genotype on Topigs Norsvin selection index value by genotype and line or across lines

Least squares mean
Line1 AA AB BB P-value Additive effect2 Additive P-value Dominance effect3 Dominance P-value
D1 93.77a (1.75) 93.87a (1.75) 93.39a (1.86) 0.74 −0.19 (0.37) 0.60 0.29 (0.38) 0.44
D2 82.40a (1.79) 82.75a (1.80) 81.72a (1.94) 0.15 −0.34 (0.39) 0.38 0.69 (0.38) 0.07
S1 90.07a (1.49) 89.76a (1.50) 89.69a (1.57) 0.48 −0.19 (0.27) 0.49 −0.12 (0.27) 0.65
S2 89.92a (1.46) 89.78a (1.48) 89.36a (1.59) 0.69 −0.28 (0.33) 0.39 0.13 (0.32) 0.67
Across lines4 89.34a (0.86) 89.35a (0.86) 89.02a (0.91) 0.56 −0.16 (0.17) 0.35 0.17 (0.17) 0.32

aEstimates within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

1D1 = Landrace dam line; D2 = Large White dam line; S1 = synthetic sire line; S2 = Pietrain sire line.

2Additive effect of WUR.

3Dominance effect of WUR.

4A significant effect of line × porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome vaccination status (P < 0.001) was detected.