Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;5(4):e002289. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002289

Table 2.

The three delays experienced in deaths from time-critical conditions, as assessed using circumstances of mortality (CoM) indicators

Delay CoM indicator Number of deceased experiencing delay*
First delay—seeking care Doubts about need for care 39 (9.90%)
Use of telephone 36 (9.14%)
Use of traditional medicine 84 (21.32%)
Perceived prohibitive costs 269 (68.27%)
Second delay—reaching care Travel to health facility 36 (9.14%)
Use of motorised transport 36 (9.14%)
Distance (more than 2 hours to facility) 0 (0.00%)
Third delay—receiving quality care Problems with admission 27 (6.85%)
Problems with treatment 26 (6.60%)
Problems with medicine 27 (6.85%)
Discharged while ill 67 (17.01%)

*Percentage does not total 100% as delays can be experienced by the same deceased person in more than one category. (The denominator is the % of deceased who responded stating any delay using CoM indicators (n=394).) The total number of delays captured for all deceased was n=647.