Table 2.
The three delays experienced in deaths from time-critical conditions, as assessed using circumstances of mortality (CoM) indicators
| Delay | CoM indicator | Number of deceased experiencing delay* |
| First delay—seeking care | Doubts about need for care | 39 (9.90%) |
| Use of telephone | 36 (9.14%) | |
| Use of traditional medicine | 84 (21.32%) | |
| Perceived prohibitive costs | 269 (68.27%) | |
| Second delay—reaching care | Travel to health facility | 36 (9.14%) |
| Use of motorised transport | 36 (9.14%) | |
| Distance (more than 2 hours to facility) | 0 (0.00%) | |
| Third delay—receiving quality care | Problems with admission | 27 (6.85%) |
| Problems with treatment | 26 (6.60%) | |
| Problems with medicine | 27 (6.85%) | |
| Discharged while ill | 67 (17.01%) |
*Percentage does not total 100% as delays can be experienced by the same deceased person in more than one category. (The denominator is the % of deceased who responded stating any delay using CoM indicators (n=394).) The total number of delays captured for all deceased was n=647.