Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;12:65. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00065

TABLE 3.

Comparison of each cognitive domain in CASI between groups with FOSSQ + and FOSSQ – adjusted for age, education, gender, and disease severity according to CDR.

Mean ± SD
Non-adjusted
Adjusted
FOSSQ + FOSSQ− t p OR (95% CI) p
N 85 581
RMM 6.2 ± 3.3 8.1 ± 2.7 −5.26 <0.001 0.98 (0.88–1.09) NS
RCM 3.6 ± 3.2 5.9 ± 4.1 −4.90 <0.001 1.01 (0.92–1.11) NS
ATT 2.3 ± 2.1 5.0 ± 2.3 −10.00 <0.001 0.67 (0.59–0.77) <0.001
MEN 1.6 ± 2.6 4.0 ± 3.5 −5.99 <0.001 0.85 (0.75–0.95) 0.006
ORI 7.4 ± 5.6 11.1 ± 5.9 −5.54 <0.001 1.03 (0.96–1.10) NS
ABS 2.8 ± 2.3 4.3 ± 2.4 −5.47 <0.001 0.93 (0.86–1.15) NS
LAN 5.8 ± 3.0 7.9 ± 2.2 −7.52 <0.001 0.89 (0.80–0.99) 0.044
DRAW 4.5 ± 3.8 6.6 ± 4.0 −4.60 <0.001 1.02 (0.94–1.10) NS
ANM 3.6 ± 3.2 5.8 ± 3.5 −5.58 <0.001 1.04 (0.93–1.15) NS

CASI, Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument; FOSSQ, Freezing of Speech Single Questionnaire; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating scale; N, number of cases; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; RMM, remote memory; RCM, recent memory; ATT, attention; MEN, mental manipulation; ORI, orientation; ABS, abstract thinking; LAN, language; DRAW, drawing; ANM, animal naming.