Table 4. Ne estimates using single sample (LDNe) and two-sample temporal methods, year(s) sampled, and Ne/Na ratios across the seven focal sites.
Population | LDNe | Temporal Ne | Ne/Na ratio | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ne | 95% CI | Year | Ne | 95% CI | Years | ||
Pacifica | 13 | 8–24 | 2018 | 9 | 8–9 | 2004–2006 2018 | 0.20 |
Skyline | 30 | 17–83 | 2018 | – | – | – | 0.64 |
Crystal Springs | 10 | 5–23 | 2018 | – | – | – | 0.20 |
San Bruno | 255 | 46 –INF | 2017 | 254 | 145–1021 | 2006–2007 2017 | 0.19 |
Mindego | 33 | 17–139 | 2016 | – | – | – | 0.16 |
Pescadero | 60 | 23 –INF | 2016 | 56 | 49–66 | 2005–2010 2016 | 0.78 |
Año Nuevo | 41 | 30–60 | 2018 | 49 | 44–56 | 2005–2006 2018 | 0.40 |
Jackknife on loci was used to estimate upper and lower confidence intervals. INF indicates an estimated confidence interval of “infinity”, suggesting there is not enough information to obtain a reliable estimate. A dash (-) indicates there were no samples available for that site/year. The critical value was set at 0.05 to screen out rare alleles. For Ne /N ratios, we used the temporal Ne estimate when available otherwise the LDNe estimate was used.