Table 4. Comparison results between LMSM and GC.
Method | %BRCA-related modules | %Module biomarkers | Mean Subset accuracy | Mean Hamming loss | #Validated interactions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSM | 58.82% | 88.24% | 0.7547 | 0.0892 | 14 |
GC | 32.41% | 66.67% | 0.6586 | 0.1319 | 2 |
Method | %BRCA-related modules | %Module biomarkers | Mean Subset accuracy | Mean Hamming loss | #Validated interactions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSM | 58.82% | 88.24% | 0.7547 | 0.0892 | 14 |
GC | 32.41% | 66.67% | 0.6586 | 0.1319 | 2 |