Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar 20;73(6):577–584. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211230

Table 1.

EDS survey response weighting structure, summary and tertile ranges, and description by coding approach, African American Women’s Heart and Health Study, Northern California, 2012–2013 (n=207)

Situation-based coding Frequency-based coding Chronicity-based coding
EDS response
Never 0 1 0
Less than once a year 1 2 0.5
A few times a year 3 3
A few times a month 4 12
At least once a week 5 104
Almost everyday 6 260
Summary score range 0–10 10–60 0–2600
Lower tertile range 0–7 10–22 0–24
Middle tertile range 8–9 23–35 24.5–448
Upper tertile range 10 36–60 482–2600
Description Number of situations ‘ever’ Likert scale summary score experienced Total annual number of EDS experiences

Owing to the granularity of the chronicity coding, not all possible values of annual EDS experiences are represented.

EDS, Everyday Discrimination Scale.