Table 5.
DON analysis of experimental diets (as-fed basis), experiment 21
| Product added, % | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Product 12 | Product 23 | |||||||
| Days 0−74 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||||
| Days 7−21 | — | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | ||||
| Days 21−28 | — | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | ||||
| Days 28−35 | — | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||||
| Days 35−42 | — | — | 0.25 | — | 0.15 | — | 0.25 | — | 0.25 |
| DON, mg/kg | |||||||||
| Days 0−7 | —4 | <0.5 | <0.5 | <0.5 | <0.5 | ||||
| Days 7−21 | 1.4 | <0.5 | 0.5 | <0.5 | <0.5 | ||||
| Days 21−28 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | ||||
| Days 28−35 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | ||||
| Days 35−42 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
1Multiple samples were collected from each diet throughout the study, homogenized, and submitted to North Dakota Grain Inspection Service, Inc. (Bucyrus, OH) for analysis of DON as determined by the ROSA DONQ2 Quantitative Test (Charms Sciences, Inc., Lawrence, MA).
2Product 1 (Defusion; Provimi, Brookville, OH).
3Product 2 (NutriQuest, Mason City, IA).
4Missing sample.