Table 5.
Main effects of the impact of diet adequacy and super-dosed phytase on nursery pig growth performance, experiment 11
Diet2 | Phytase, FTU/kg | P values | ||||||
Item | PC | NC | 0 | 2,500 | SEM | Diet | Phytase | Diet × Phytase |
Initial BW, kg | 6.26 | 6.27 | 6.27 | 6.26 | 0.285 | 0.094 | 0.693 | 0.629 |
Final BW, kg | 22.44 | 21.68 | 21.89 | 22.23 | 0.501 | 0.002 | 0.144 | 0.342 |
ADG, kg/d | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.039 | 0.450 |
ADFI, kg/d | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.010 | 0.341 | 0.172 | 0.563 |
G:F | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.558 |
Energy efficiency, kg gain/Mcal ME or NE3 | ||||||||
ME | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.623 |
NE | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.233 |
1Data are least square means; n = 10 pens per treatment with 10 pigs per pen, totaling 440 pigs; sexes were not split but were even across treatments; 35-d trial.
2The NC was achieved by reducing SID lysine by 10% with proportional lowering of all other essential AA, plus reducing added fat by 1 percentage point.
3Energy efficiency calculated as: ADG / (ME or NE of diet × ADFI).