Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;3(4):1153–1161. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz118

Table 4.

Effect of DDGS supplementation during grazing on subsequent carcass characteristics of heifers following a common finishing diet

Treatment1
Item CONT SUP SEM P-value
HCW2, kg 333.2 338.2 4.38 0.47
LM area, cm2 81.94 80.65 1.235 0.50
12th rib back fat, cm 1.21 1.26 0.057 0.57
Marbling score3 470 514 22.3 0.24
KPH, % 1.85 1.85 0.082 0.99
Quality grade4 10.2 10.6 0.25 0.28
Yield grade 2.8 3.0 0.10 0.30
Dress, % 58.7 58.3 0.33 0.86

1CONT = 0% DDGS supplementation; SUP = 0.6% of BW DDGS supplementation.

2HCW = hot carcass weight.

3Marbling score based on 400 = Small00.

4Quality grade based on Low Choice (Ch-) = 10, High Prime (Pr+) = 15.