Table 4.
Effect of DDGS supplementation during grazing on subsequent carcass characteristics of heifers following a common finishing diet
| Treatment1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | CONT | SUP | SEM | P-value |
| HCW2, kg | 333.2 | 338.2 | 4.38 | 0.47 |
| LM area, cm2 | 81.94 | 80.65 | 1.235 | 0.50 |
| 12th rib back fat, cm | 1.21 | 1.26 | 0.057 | 0.57 |
| Marbling score3 | 470 | 514 | 22.3 | 0.24 |
| KPH, % | 1.85 | 1.85 | 0.082 | 0.99 |
| Quality grade4 | 10.2 | 10.6 | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| Yield grade | 2.8 | 3.0 | 0.10 | 0.30 |
| Dress, % | 58.7 | 58.3 | 0.33 | 0.86 |
1CONT = 0% DDGS supplementation; SUP = 0.6% of BW DDGS supplementation.
2HCW = hot carcass weight.
3Marbling score based on 400 = Small00.
4Quality grade based on Low Choice (Ch-) = 10, High Prime (Pr+) = 15.