Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;3(1):135–148. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy117

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effect of yeast supplementation on serum glucose response in beef heifers (n = 16/trt). Heifers were fed one of two dietary treatments: 1) negative control (CON), fed a standard feedlot diet, or 2) the same standard feedlot diet with 2.5 g·heifer−1·d−1 live yeast and 2.5 g·heifer−1·d−1 yeast cell wall product (Phileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Milwaukee, WI) for 31 d prior to challenge (YST). Data presented as least squares means ± SEM and 0 h was used as a covariate in the analysis. All heifers were challenged intranasally with 2 × 108 plaque-forming units bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) at −144 h and 3 × 107 colony-forming units Mannheimia haemolytica at 0 h. There was a tendency for a treatment × time interaction (P = 0.04) such that CON heifers had decreased serum glucose at 1 h and remained so until 6 h following BHV-1/M. haemolytica. Serum glucose was similar between dietary treatments (P = 0.25).