Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;3(4):1182–1193. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz127

Table 3.

Cumulative heifer performance in experiment 21

Implant Days on feed (DOF) Implant × DOF
Item SINGLE REPEATED SEM2 P-value 150 171 192 SEM2 P-value P-value
n 3 1,795 1,811 1,217 1,197 1,192
Initial BW4, kg 337 337 0.6 0.36 338 337 336 0.8 0.07 0.88
Final BW4, kg 596 594 1.9 0.25 574c 596b 615a 2.4 0.01 0.79
ADG, kg 1.51 1.49 0.011 0.14 1.55a 1.50b 1.44c 0.014 0.01 0.81
DMI, kg 9.65 9.53 0.061 0.06 9.59 9.60 9.58 0.074 0.97 0.32
G:F 0.156 0.156 0.0013 0.99 0.162c 0.156b 0.150a 0.0016 0.01 0.84
Carcass-adjusted5
 Final BW, kg 610 611 1.7 0.36 586c 611b 633a 2.1 0.01 0.25
 ADG, kg 1.58 1.61 0.010 0.57 1.63a 1.58b 1.54c 0.013 0.01 0.20
 G:F 0.164 0.166 0.0011 0.03 0.170c 0.165b 0.160a 0.0013 0.01 0.92

1Treatments were: Implanted with either Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated; 200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2, total) on arrival or Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated) on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2, uncoated) at approximately 90 DOF and cattle harvest at 150, 171, or 192 days on feed.

2The SE of the difference between treatment means (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC).

3Harvested.

4Shrunk 4% to account for gastrointestinal tract fill.

5Final BW was calculated as HCW/0.625.

a,b,cMeans within row are different (P < 0.05).