Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;3(4):1182–1193. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz127

Table 7.

Carcass Quality and Yield grade of heifers in experiment 21

Implant Days on feed (DOF) Implant × DOF
Item SINGLE REPEATED SEM2 P-value 150 171 192 SEM2 P-value P-value
Prime, % 7.0 5.5 1.14 0.10 4.7b 6.6ab 7.5a 1.23 0.04 0.13
Choice, % 78.1 77.9 1.91 0.92 78.2 77.0 78.8 2.08 0.65 0.56
Select, % 14.3 15.5 2.39 0.49 16.2 16.0 12.5 2.53 0.14 0.93
No roll, % 0.6 1.1 0.29 0.17 0.9 0.4 1.2 0.34 0.15 0.12
Yield Grade 1, % 7.8 9.7 1.30 0.10 8.4 10.2 7.7 1.43 0.21 0.87
Yield Grade 2, % 28.2 36.2 1.12 0.01 35.2 33.7 27.8 1.35 0.01 0.01
Yield Grade 3, % 41.2 38.3 1.43 0.06 42.5 38.2 38.6 1.63 0.05 0.01
Yield Grade 4, % 19.1 13.3 1.17 0.01 12.4b 15.2b 21.2a 1.34 0.01 0.26
Yield Grade 5, % 3.7 2.5 0.60 0.15 1.5b 2.7b 4.7a 0.72 0.01 0.91
HCW ≥ 454 kg, % 1.6 2.2 0.37 0.22 0.3 1.5 4.0 0.45 0.01 0.06

1Treatments were: Implanted with either Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated; 200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2, total) on arrival or Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated) on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2, uncoated) at approximately 90 DOF and cattle harvest at 150, 171, or 192 days on feed.

2Pooled within factor SE from the ILINK option (SAS Inst., Cary, NC).

a,bMeans within row are different (P < 0.05).