Table 1.
Number of hooves (No. of hooves) and their percentage of the total dataset (% of total) from the exploratory (Exploratory exp.) and validation (Validation exp.) experiments, categorized by type of hoof lesion scoring scale and hoof score (Score)
| Exploratory exp. | Validation exp. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of hoof lesion scale | Score | Definition* | No. of hooves | % of total | No. of hooves | % of total |
| Hoof lesion scale by Conington et al. (2008) | 0 | Healthy hoof | 577 | 94.44 | 119 | 94.44 |
| 1 | Mild IDD | 26 | 4.26 | 6 | 4.76 | |
| 2 | Extensive IDD | 6 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.79 | |
| 3 | Severe IDD/foot rot | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | Severe foot rot | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Categorical hoof lesion scale | 0 | Healthy hoof | 577 | 93.82 | 119 | 93.70 |
| 1 | Mild IDD | 26 | 4.23 | 6 | 4.72 | |
| 2 | Extensive IDD or worse | 12 | 1.95 | 2 | 1.57 | |
| Binary hoof lesion scale | 0 | Healthy hoof | 577 | 92.03 | 119 | 89.47 |
| 1 | Mild IDD or worse | 50 | 7.97 | 14 | 10.53 | |
Both the categorical and binary hoof lesion scales were derived from the hoof lesion scale from Conington et al. (2008).
*IDD = Interdigital dermatitis.