Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;3(1):369–376. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy091

Table 2.

Chemical analysis of diets (experiment 1; as-fed basis)a

Item Phase 1 Phase 2
Control Added Cu, mg/kg Control Added Cu, mg/kg
TBCCb Cu-chelatec TBCCb Cu-chelatec
50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150
Dry matter, % 87.5 87.2 86.8 86.7 86.6 86.6 86.8 86.7 86.4 85.8 85.6 86.2 86.1 85.7
Crude protein, % 21.9 21.0 20.6 20.9 20.8 20.8 20.8 19.2 20.4 19.9 21.9 18.9 19.6 21.2
Crude fiber, % 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.0
Ether extract, % 7.1 6.8 7.2 6.9 6.6 7.6 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.3 5.3 6.3 5.6 5.6
Ash, % 5.7 5.7 5.6 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.6
Ca, % 0.85 0.78 0.77 0.82 0.75 0.86 0.76 0.75 0.97 1.00 0.76 1.01 0.87 0.91
P, % 0.76 0.74 0.68 0.79 0.73 0.83 0.78 0.62 0.72 0.79 0.77 0.81 0.66 0.88
Cu, mg/kg 40 88 140 145 104 155 204 40 75 119 174 100 135 230

a Multiple samples of each diet were collected, blended and subsampled, and analyzed (Missouri Agricultural Experimentation Lab, Colombia, MO; Ward Laboratories, Kearney, NE; and Midwest Labs, Omaha, NE). All values represent the combined average of the chemical analyses of diets for the experiment.

b Tri-basic copper chloride, (IntelliBond C, Micronutrients USA).

c Copper-methionine hydroxy analogue (Mintrex Cu, Novus International).