Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;2(2):205–215. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy007

Table 2.

Effects of rumen-protected L-Arg (RP-Arg) supplementation or intravenously injected L-Arg-HCl on DMI and OM intake and site of digestion in forage-fed steers

Treatmentsa
Item CON Arg-INJ Arg-RP180 Arg-RP360 SEM P-value
Total DMI, kg/d 7.76 8.09 7.25 8.92 0.95 0.29
 Hay DMI, kg 7.76 8.09 7.12 8.67 0.95 0.34
 RP-Arg DMI, g/d 0b 0b 122b 242c 1.0 <0.001
Total OM intake, kg/d 7.03 7.32 6.45 7.85 0.86 0.34
Duodenal OM flow, kg/d 3.21 3.11 3.22 3.65 0.36 0.48
 Bacterial OM flow 0.543 0.477 0.523 0.551 0.047 0.31
 Apparent feed OM 2.67 2.64 2.70 3.09 0.32 0.51
Ileal OM flow, kg/d 2.62 2.90 2.66 3.06 0.28 0.53
Fecal OM output, kg/d 2.38 2.68 2.51 2.88 0.30 0.20
OM digestibility, % of intake
 Apparent ruminal 53.1 57.5 48.5 53.8 3.2 0.20
 True ruminale 61.1 64.0 56.2 59.4 3.1 0.26
 Apparent small intestinal 17.2 8.6 14.8 14.8 3.2 0.14
 Apparent large intestinal −5.20 −2.66 −3.93 −5.71 3.41 0.82
 Apparent total tract 65.6 63.7 59.8 62.0 2.6 0.12

aTreatments included: ad libitum intake of grass hay (CON), CON with 27 mg L-Arg-HCl/kg BW injected intravenously twice daily (54 mg/kg BW daily; Arg-INJ), CON with 90 mg rumen-protected L-Arg/kg BW supplemented twice daily (180 mg/kg BW daily; Arg-RP180), and CON with 180 mg rumen-protected L-Arg/kg BW supplemented twice daily (360 mg/kg BW daily; Arg-RP360).

b,cMeans within a row without a common letter superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05).

eCorrected for OM of bacterial origin.