Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 27;3(4):1162–1172. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz109

Table 2.

Effects of DA on growth performance of finishing beef steers

Treatment P-value1
Item Control LowDA HighDA SEM L Q
Growth performance
Live body weight2, kg
 Initial 468 469 468 4.1 0.99 0.89
 Period 1 536 538 536 5.1 0.96 0.65
 Period 2 578 594 595 6.1 0.06 0.35
 Period 3 638 649 656 6.6 0.06 0.84
 Final 664 671 675 7.1 0.27 0.99
ADG3, kg/d
 Period 1 2.49 2.57 2.50 0.09 0.93 0.46
 Period 2 1.59 2.11 2.17 0.10 0.003 0.10
 Period 3 2.05 1.90 2.12 0.09 0.63 0.14
 Period 4 1.13 0.96 0.99 0.09 0.28 0.37
 Overall 1.82 1.87 1.95 0.05 0.09 0.81
DMI, kg
 Period 1 9.96 10.22 10.02 0.51 0.94 0.72
 Period 2 8.33 9.62 9.46 0.38 0.06 0.15
 Period 3 9.87 10.36 10.31 0.51 0.56 0.68
 Period 4 8.00 7.92 8.02 0.40 0.97 0.85
 Overall 9.04 9.53 9.45 0.30 0.36 0.46
Gain:feed ratio, kg/kg
 Period 1 0.252 0.249 0.255 0.014 0.96 0.96
 Period 2 0.193 0.211 0.234 0.013 0.05 0.95
 Period 3 0.214 0.193 0.215 0.009 0.94 0.07
 Period 4 0.145 0.119 0.116 0.011 0.22 0.40
 Overall 0.205 0.199 0.205 0.006 0.50 0.25

1L, linear effects; Q, quadratic effects.

2BW were reported as shrunk weight (BW × 0.96) to compensate for gut fill.

3ADG was calculated based on shrunk BW gain (final BW – initial BW).