Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;3(1):340–349. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy103

Table 3.

Treatment effects on fecal attributes and digestibility

CON1 SP2 PP3 SEM Treatment Age × Trt4 Sex × Trt5
P value P value P value
Fecal attributes
 Fecal pH 6.89b 7.03a 6.99ab 0.08 0.2 0.02 0.02
 Fecal score6 2.94 2.97 2.97 0.07 0.9
 FO7, kg/d 2.61 2.75 2.64 0.10 0.6
DM digestibility, %8
 TFC 44.7 41.0 43.6 2.6 0.4
 CR 84.6a 84.0a 81.4b 0.9 0.04
 Lig 91.5 91.1 91.1 0.52 0.64
 iADF 81.0 80.6 80.1 1.17 0.7
 iNDF 76.7 76.2 75.7 1.3 0.7
 iLig 71.8 69.8 69.9 2.5 0.7

Superscripts within row indicates least square means differences of treatments P < 0.05.

1Control, no feed additive.

2Smartpak.

3Platinum Performance.

4The interaction of age and treatment.

5The interaction of sex and treatment.

6Fecal scores were recorded daily on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 = osmotic liquid diarrhea; 2 = mild diarrhea, feces are semiliquid but have some solid component; 3 = normal manure with soft consistency; 4 = normal feces in well-formed fecal balls; and 5 = very dry small fecal balls.

7Total fecal output.

8DM digestibility measurements were made on total fecal collections (TFC), chromium oxide (CR), lignin (Lig), indigestible ADF (iADF), indigestible NDF (iNDF), and indigestible lignin (iLig).